Lambert critical of sackings

Aston Villa boss Paul Lambert believes the sackings of Brian McDermott and Nigel Adkins prove football is not necessarily a results business.

Post a Comment:

Comments 1 - 2 of (2)

onceavillain... (Aston Villa) says...

I think Lambert is spot on here. One look at the league table tells you that there is no such thing as 'Mid-table security' at this stage of the season this year. Whereas in previous years the bottom three much like the top three were pretty much confirmed at Christmas, this season any one of 8 or 9 teams could easily get drawn into the mix based on recent form and Reading or Southamptons form hasn't been any worse than a good many in the lower half of the table prior to the sackings. Recent history also confirms that 9 out of 10 sackings in this situation have resulted in the team being relegated under a replacement manager. If this is purely about making sound financial decisions and you convert this into business terms it means that the owner has chosen to adopt the weakest business model available in the hope that he will be the one man to reverse an established trend. Between now and the end of the season every team will play the same number of games knowing that they need the most points available and at the end of the day whether they stay or go will be down to grit and determination. Given that I live in London and I heard the bottle drop out of Anton Zingarevichs arse from here I'd say that's what's missing from the boardroom not the team.

Posted 8:43pm 17th March 2013

crowsy (Chelsea) says...

TBH this article is a load of tosh. If Reading and Soton were in mid table safety their managers were still be there, simples. Also we are told constantly now that football is a business so F365 would do you think happens in the world of business when the chairman thinks his company (Football Club) is in danger of making a loss or even worse making a loss and get relegated? It is the chairmans/owner of football clubs to take these decisions. Rightly or wrongly it is for them to make. Personally I think Reading were wrong. It looks like they might be going down but he should have a shot so why not leave the manager in place and sort it all out in the summer break instead of getting someone in who will have tons of stress. Let's say the new manager of Reading cannot keep him up, does he get the sack too?

Posted 9:50pm 15th March 2013

  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1

Related News

Sky Bet

    • Retrieving latest Sky Bet odds

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

A

nd nothing of value was lost.

ahx00
Pulis' Stoke exit confirmed

S

anity1892 Yes I probably should... But everytime I go back and read Almunia for England I just lose bladder control.

sir danne
The Busy Gossip

P

erfect replacement for Carragher. Slow, average when he was at his best, now well past it. Would just slot straight in! :)

rez plus
Liverpool eye Kolo move - Report

Footer 365

Kris Commons retires from international duty with Scotland

Kris Commons has retired from international duty with Scotland to 'concentrate on his family and on club football'.

Transfer news: Samir Nasri staying with Manchester City despite links to PSG

Manchester City midfielder Samir Nasri insists he wants to stay at the Etihad Stadium.

Premier League: Chelsea defender Gary Cahill would welcome Jose Mourinho

Chelsea defender Gary Cahill would welcome the anticipated return of Jose Mourinho to Stamford Bridge.

Mail Box

Mourinho Isn't Short-Term, Football Is

There's more in the afternoon Mailbox about Jose Mourinho and his potential return to Chelsea, while there's also a link to some pictures of eagles that look like Arsene Wenger...

Should Chelsea Be Worried About Jose Return?

After a disappointing end to his three years at Real Madrid, could Jose Mourinho struggle to bring immediate success if he completes his anticipated return to Chelsea?

© 2013 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved