Next Game

Motherwell v Celtic

Saturday, 19 April 2014, 12:45

Scots Prem

Tannadice Park

Last Game

Dundee Utd 0 - 2 Celtic

Saturday, 05 April 2014, 12:45

Scots Prem

Celtic looking for a change

Celtic chief executive Peter Lawwell has confirmed that the Parkhead club will tomorrow vote for league reconstruction while claiming the status quo is "not palatable".

Last Updated: 14/04/13 at 12:35 Post Comment

Peter Lawwell: Will vote for league reconstruction

Peter Lawwell: Will vote for league reconstruction

All 12 Scottish Premier League clubs will meet at Hampden to vote on the proposals which includes a move to a 12-12-18 league structure - with it then splitting into 8-8-8-18 after 22 games - the move to a single league and a redistribution of monies.

It requires an 11-1 vote to progress but St Mirren chairman Stewart Gilmour has indicated that the Buddies will vote against the proposal vote, while he is also against the continuation of the 11-1 which is required for certain issues.

There remains uncertainty about Ross County's position but Lawwell told Celtic's official website: "We are coming to the end of the process and it's either change or the status quo.

"When you look across over the wall, if it doesn't happen, then what is the flip side? And the flip side is it stays the same. That, to me, is not palatable.

"From Celtic's point of view, come Monday night if it doesn't go through, we'll be disappointed because we put a lot of work into it and we see it as the right thing for the game.

"It would be unfortunate for the longer term interests of the whole game in Scotland as it would be a huge opportunity lost."

Positive

Lawwell claimed the changes will lead to, among other things, more meaningful fixtures and stability within the game.

"Firstly, we are very, very close," he said.

"And we felt it was unanimous, up until recently, that this should be taken forward.

"The second reason is because we think it is right for the game. It's not perfect but it's the best available. The reason we think that is because it gives the one body which is a positive.

"It gives redistribution to the SFL which actually transforms, financially, the majority of the SFL clubs.

"And it also provides more meaningful games and that I think we can see even in the last week.

"The last three times we went to St Mirren there were 6,000 there. Nine thousand were at the Ramsdens Cup final, so too at Partick Thistle against Morton, and St Mirren also took about 17,000 to Hampden (for the Scottish Communities League Cup final).

"When there is something to play for, when there are meaningful games, the fans come out.

"It will give more meaningful games and therefore more attraction to the fans. Therefore, more attraction to broadcasters and therefore more attraction to sponsors.

"It will also give us stability. We've been at this for three years and we've never come as close to an agreement. I think stability is vital. If we get two or three years' stability it gives the league credibility and something back to our broadcasters and sponsors.

"In football, stability is everything."

Decisions

Lawwell revealed his disappointment with regards St Mirren's position but is hopeful all other clubs can work together to take the game forward.

"We're disappointed there appears to be some positions changed in recent weeks but we respect the right of every club to have their own vote," he said.

"We believe in the voting structure for the protected items because these are huge decisions with huge implications.

"We respect the fact they have to do what is right for them but we have to take into account what is right for Scottish football. We respect the right but we need to understand the reasons for clubs would want to vote against this."

Football365 Facebook Fan Page

The Football365 fan page is a great place to meet like minded people, have football related discussions and make new friends.

Related News

Sky Bet

    • Retrieving latest Sky Bet odds

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

H

e was right to leave, but not just because of the money City were coming into. If I remember rightly he had a reasonable amount of chances to shine at City, but he never passed the bloody ball. Loads of aimless dribbles and 40 yard shots and not much else. I would say that if he had learnt to be a bit more of a team player he may have done better at City.

bright and edgy
Sturridge: Right to leave City

O

h! And.... has it gone in!?' Well John, it is quite literally your job to tell me, so stop phrasing it as a question.

ajsr1982
Eye On The Experts: John Motson

M

an who resembles bond villain complains about spies ....brillliant

mrjackson
Palace deny spying accusation

Footer 365

Luton Town promoted to Football League after winning Conference Premier title

Luton Town have won promotion from the Conference Premier - ending a five-year absence from the Football League.

Premier League: West Ham boss Sam Allardyce frustrated to lose lead at Arsenal

West Ham boss Sam Allardyce admitted his frustration at his side's inability to hold their lead in the loss at Arsenal.

Premier League: Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger hails importance of West Ham win

Arsene Wenger hailed the importance of Arsenal's victory over West Ham as his side came from behind to win 3-1.

Mail Box

Worried Liverpool Will Become A Selling Club

Liverpool fans in the mailbox are not too worried about sour grapes from United supporters, but one admits he's scared the Reds could end up selling their best players...

United Should Have Gone For Bruce And Hughes

A mailbox asking why United did not go for two old boys over Moyes, what Wenger's targets were for the season and whether he's had a better season than Pellegrini..?

© 2014 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved A Sky Sports Digital Media property