Disallowed Goal Not Even The Worst Decision

While there was plenty of debate about whether Cheick Tiote's goal should have stood, Nick Miller thinks Mike Jones made a worse decision in Newcastle v Man City...

Last Updated: 13/01/14 at 08:57 Post Comment

Latest Articles

Sterling's Meteoric Rise Key To Liverpool Challenge

4 comments

The form of Raheem Sterling has been crucial in Liverpool's title challenge, as Ali Tweedale of WhoScored.com highlights. Expect the youngster to play a key role in the run-in...

Please Stop Telling Us What To Think

73 comments

It's fine to have an opinion - everybody does - but Matt Stanger is tired of being told what to think about the title race. Liverpool deserve it? We'll see on May 11...

All Articles

Ah, a good refereeing controversy. Gives you a warm fuzzy feeling inside, doesn't it? Like sharks, it feels like football fans, journalists and broadcasters might die if we stop moving - and in this instance for 'moving' read 'arguing about a contentious decision in a game of football'.

Of course, in the back and forth about whether Mike Jones was correct in deciding that Yoan Gouffran was interfering with play when Cheick Tiote's shot fizzed past his nose, it's easy to miss the real point, specifically that Alan Pardew's reaction was really funny. He was understandably angry, but nonetheless, it was funny.

You are all cordially invited to peruse the laws of the game yourself and squabble over whether Jones did in fact make the correct decision. It all seems to rest on your interpretation of whether Gouffran was interfering with an opponent, and whether you can shake the image of Gouffran interfering with Joe Hart in a non-football context.

One point though - if you watch Hart's reaction, he paused after the ball hit the net, and only started to appeal as he looked around, possibly for an excuse or an explanation as to why he didn't dive. It was a little like how wicketkeepers appeal for a leg-side catch in cricket to try and put the umpire off giving a wide. Of course, it's possible that Hart didn't dive because he knew Gouffran was there and thought he would block the ball, but that is firstly quite unlikely given the speed of the incident, and secondly not especially good goalkeeping.

The odd thing is that if the Manchester City keeper had positioned himself better, then Gouffran would clearly have been interfering. As it was, Hart was standing so close to his near post and of course didn't move - had Hart dived from a more central position and been impeded by Gouffran, the decision would have been clear.

One of the problems is not quite so much the decision itself, but how Jones arrived at it. The referee was, unusually, directly in line with the Manchester City defence, so therefore should have immediately seen that Gouffran was in an offside position. And thus, if he was offside, whether he was interfering with play. There is nothing wrong with consulting with an assistant in the interests of accuracy over speed, but if Jones was absolutely sure that the latter was true, then it was curious that he felt the need to ask his assistant. Particularly as that simply gave the impression that the final decision was reached only after some rather hearty complaints from the City players.

Still, this was the type of decision that will always provoke debate because it relies on such subjectivity. It will always be contentious because the laws are written in such a way as to rely on the referee's interpretation of what is and is not interfering with an opponent. And it's tough to see how that could change unless it is changed to Brian Clough's old maxim of 'if you're not interfering with play, what are you doing on the pitch?' It will again presumably inspire plenty of 'all we want is consistency' comments, which of course is impossible when such subjectivity is in play.

Arguably a worse decision was Jones' failure to send Mapou Yanga-Mbiwa off for a horrendous chop on Samir Nasri, a chop that forced his international colleague off with what Manuel Pellegrini described after the game as a 'very serious' injury. Of course the referee should not make such a decision on the basis of the injury, but it deserved a red card even if Nasri had gaily hopped up and carried on with the game.

Yanga-Mbiwa pulled Nasri back by his shoulder, missed with a right-footed swing, missed with a left-footed swing then finally made thumping contact with another knee-high hack. In one incident, at least two bookings and a straight red card for violent conduct. Quite why Jones only issued a yellow card is a far more baffling decision than disallowing Tiote's goal, but not the one that will get the headlines.

Nick Miller - follow him on Twitter

@HarryBoulton: I agree that its usually overblown, which is why Inpersonally think we need some sort of video replay system. At the very least, some guy on too watching everything that the ref can ask stuff about. I mean, refs do sometimes ask their referees stuff, why not have one guy up there that act as a video "referee" which the main ref can refer to from time to time for certain incidents. It's far more important than goalpost. Of course it can't be done for all decisions, but some but very big ones. I understand its going to be far more complicated (I mean what constitute a "big" decision that you can put in black and white?) than what I described in this post and it will have its downsides and unforseen consequences but I do believe that it needs to be attempted in a game that is very slow in adapting technology. Not that it has much chance of happening anytime soon with FIFA being what they are.
- SonicSP

Football365 Facebook Fan Page

The Football365 fan page is a great place to meet like minded people, have football related discussions and make new friends.

Sky Bet

    • Retrieving latest Sky Bet odds

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

H

e was right to leave, but not just because of the money City were coming into. If I remember rightly he had a reasonable amount of chances to shine at City, but he never passed the bloody ball. Loads of aimless dribbles and 40 yard shots and not much else. I would say that if he had learnt to be a bit more of a team player he may have done better at City.

bright and edgy
Sturridge: Right to leave City

O

h! And.... has it gone in!?' Well John, it is quite literally your job to tell me, so stop phrasing it as a question.

ajsr1982
Eye On The Experts: John Motson

M

an who resembles bond villain complains about spies ....brillliant

mrjackson
Palace deny spying accusation

Latest Photos

Footer 365

West Ham's Matt Jarvis thinks he may need to be more clever after Arsenal penalty incident

West Ham's Matt Jarvis says he may have to be "a bit more clever" after staying on his feet despite Bacary Sagna's foul.

Transfer news: Damien Duff already planning for life after Fulham

Damien Duff has confirmed that he will be leaving Fulham this summer and will be going in search of 'something new'.

Premier League: Harry Kane feels youngsters are crucial to Tottenham's cause

Harry Kane believes he and a number of fellow academy graduates are capable of holding down regular roles at Tottenham.

Mail Box

Will Liverpool Cope With Parked Buses?

That's the real problem they're going to face next year, says one Man United fan who's already looking forward to the end of this campaign. Plus, thoughts on neutrality...

Worried Liverpool Will Become A Selling Club

Liverpool fans in the mailbox are not too worried about sour grapes from United supporters, but one admits he's scared the Reds could end up selling their best players...

© 2014 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved A Sky Sports Digital Media property