There's A Good Reason For The 'Double Punishment'

Many say that offenders like Martin Demichelis should not be punished twice with a red card and a penalty, but Philip Cornwall argues that there is a good reason for it...

Last Updated: 19/02/14 at 11:48 Post Comment

Latest Articles

New Season, New Shape For United

12 comments

Change is afoot at Manchester United as Louis van Gaal switches the team's formation to 3-5-2. Will he find the defensive additions to make the system work?

Blackpool: A Farce That Is No Longer Funny

20 comments

Blackpool's eight contracted players may have raised amusement amongst many, but it really isn't funny. A community club is being strangled and suffocated before our eyes...

All Articles

It is always a struggle to summon up sympathy for a player who commits an obvious offence on the fringes of the penalty area and is punished by a spot-kick, and Martin Demichelis would be no exception even without Manuel Pellegrini's complaints. Still, the incident raises questions beyond that of how many matches the Manchester City manager will watch from the stands.

The defender's prospects of reaching the ball without first taking Lionel Messi were slim to nonexistent and Manchester City's protestations about where first contact took place were overblown; seeking reward for committing a foul a fraction of a second before the Barcelona player reached the 18-yard line is to miss the point that justice would have been best served had Messi simply gone on to score. City were unhappy about the dispossession of Jesus Navas, but they had been undone and should not have benefited from Demichelis's desperation. There remains the question, though, of whether they suffered too much.

John Collins raised the perennial issue, of whether the red card plus penalty is too great a punishment (allowing for it being a spot-kick and not a free-kick just outside). These are, undeniably, game-changing moments and when there is a hint of controversy about any aspect of the decision the double blow appears especially harsh. But Demichelis's hopeless challenge - hopeless in the sense that it stood no chance of being successful - was a reminder of exactly why this double punishment exists, and of the risks of removing it.

There are circumstances where any player would commit an offence to preserve his team's chances - such as Luis Suarez's handball for Uruguay in the dying seconds against Ghana at the last World Cup. If the ball goes in then his team are out; the penalty and red card were worth the slim chance that the spot-kick would be missed, as indeed was the case. Far more frequently, though, the risk of suffering the double punishment acts as a deterrent.

As when people call for the abolition of offside, the fallacy is to imagine that we would have the game of today; change the laws and tactics change, too. Every time you see a player pull out of a hopeless challenge in front of goal because he considers the punishment would be too great, without the red card to go with the penalty he would instead dive in. After all, what the hell?

The reason why we wound up with the double punishment was because of what was known at the time as a professional foul, because players were making that calculation. That was before football became quite the high-stakes game of today; it mattered hugely but it was a more patient era. Now, coaches would not hesitate to tell players to take the man, cynically denying opponents obvious goalscoring opportunities.

You cannot but feel sorry for defenders who make successful tackles that are misread by the referee, and who suffer a double injustice. But given that we will never have perfect officiating we have to ask ourselves which rule would give us the fewest injustices. And that is the current one.

Philip Cornwall

Football365 Facebook Fan Page

The Football365 fan page is a great place to meet like minded people, have football related discussions and make new friends.

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

H

e made his power play to try and get Sheikhy to raise his wages or trade him to PSG. PSG were probably not interested and he is stuck with no cake and no vacation. @Jay_D> Surely you jest about FFP being real, right? All Platini is doing is making billionaries pay measly fines, so he and his cronies can get rich. If a fool can pay 50 mil for David Luiz, he will happily pay some fine to UEFA. FFP has failed as for it to succeed UEFA had to take it...

Synergy
Toure: I am staying with City

G

uess we can expect Toure's explanation of his behaviour around the same time Pete Townshend publishes his book then.

ceeps
Toure: I am staying with City

D

amn you Yaya, don't scare me like that! I only ate the icing. I didn't eat the soft and scrumptious middle - I will buy you another cake!

MCFC87
Toure: I am staying with City

Latest Photos

Footer 365

Liverpool's Adam Lallana could miss start of Premier League with knee injury

Adam Lallana looks set to miss the start of the new Premier League season after suffering a knee injury in training.

Liverpool: Fara Williams welcomes Steven Gerrard contract news

Fara Williams reckons the contract set to be handed to Steven Gerrard will give Liverpool supporters a huge boost.

Transfer news: Sunderland sign Patrick van Aanholt from Chelsea

Sunderland have completed the signing of Holland left-back Patrick van Aanholt from Chelsea on a four-year deal.

Mail Box

Are Pre-Season Tours Really A Problem?

Are pre-season tours really a problem? Liverpool went to Australia last summer and it didn't prevent them from having a good season. Plus, thoughts on LvG and keepers...

It Isn't Easy Supporting Spurs, You Know

We have a long mail about the travails of supporting Spurs, plus Friday thoughts on Marko Marin, marketing, victory v beauty, travelling and vanishing sprays...

© 2014 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved A Sky Sports Digital Media property