Matt Stanger watched Mesut Ozil answer his critics with a telling contribution in Arsenal's 3-0 thrashing of Aston Villa. It's now a question of playing him alongside Alexis Sanchez...
That's the message from a Man United fan in the mailbox. Plus, thoughts on Paul Lambert's new contract, the Alan Pardew dilemma at Newcastle and lots more...
After Jose Mourinho's risible reaction to Chelsea's defeat to Sunderland, there were many who opined that the Portuguese's behaviour was precisely the reason he was overlooked by Manchester United in the summer. But Sir Alex Ferguson was no stranger to a tantrum and, after David Moyes' dismissal just ten months into his tenure, United might still regret their decision.
Tuesday's match should make Ferguson, and those who acquiesced in his choice, feel a little better. Mourinho's insolence isn't the only black mark against his name, with United also reportedly having doubts over his particular brand of football. Against Atletico Madrid, those doubts were reinforced as Chelsea failed to mount a meaningful attack in 90 minutes. If you approach a game with a siege mentality, it shouldn't be a surprise when it eventually turns into a siege.
Ferguson was also pragmatic when it was necessary as United's 2008 semi-final win over Barcelona demonstrated. And, when he gets it right, Mourinho's counter-attacking system can yield some of the most exhilarating football around. Arguably the best performance we've seen in the Premier League this season was Chelsea's 1-0 win over Manchester City at the Etihad, with the visitors not only stopping a juggernaut that evening, but derailing it. City haven't been the same since.
But Tuesday was not a display Chelsea can boast about, despite getting the 0-0 draw they planned for. The picture at the top of this article perfectly sums up their intention to kill the game rather than play it. The Blues were dogged, resilient and committed, but they lacked any impetus in the final third with Fernando Torres cutting a lonely figure all night. At times it was hard to believe this was a Champions League semi-final and Mourinho will face questions about his approach as a consequence.
There are times when parking the bus is the best option and, while many claim Mourinho employed the tactic away to Arsenal, Manchester United and City in the Premier League, this was the first time Chelsea have been truly negative. They didn't manage a shot on target until the second half, recorded just 31% possession and completed only 63% of their passes in 90 minutes. Five players had a pass accuracy below 70% - in the interest of context, that's lower than the season averages for Liam Ridgewell and Danny Graham.
Perhaps it was necessary to be cautious against a team who lead La Liga with only four games remaining. But this wasn't the attacking might of Bayern Munich or Real Madrid Chelsea faced - this was Atletico's first semi-final at this level in 40 years, and the Blues made them look like ever-presents. There is such a thing as showing too much respect.
Of course, Mourinho doesn't have to satisfy anyone but himself, the club's fans and Roman Abramovich and, despite how rotten Chelsea were in attack, they are in a strong position to make their second final appearance in three years. However, one wonders if Abramovich will be entirely happy with what he watched at the Vicente Calderon, or whether he will ponder if this is why he splashed out on Oscar, Willian and the absent Eden Hazard, and why he is planning to write another cheque for a new striker in the summer.
Chelsea might not be 'ready' to mount a convincing challenge across all fronts, as Mourinho has persistently reminded everyone, but they should be closing in on that aim by now. By defending for 90 minutes and only providing half a performance on Tuesday, it seems they are still some way from becoming the finished article - a team who can win in style rather than grinding out results.
Matt Stanger - follow him on Twitter.