It's clear that Jose Mourinho has a problem with Romelu Lukaku, and it appears he will be leaving Chelsea for good. Is Jose in danger of cutting off his nose to spite his face?
Are pre-season tours really a problem? Liverpool went to Australia last summer and it didn't prevent them from having a good season. Plus, thoughts on LvG and keepers...
Jurgen Klopp keeps saying no, Ryan Giggs will have the reins for at least a few weeks, but sooner or later someone will say yes to Manchester United. The lack of Champions League football, the poor state of Sir Alex Ferguson's legacy exacerbated under David Moyes and Ed Woodward, and the uncertainty of life under the Glazers will be compensated for by, well, compensation: United will pay shed loads of money.
And whoever arrives will be given another shed load, or maybe a gazebo, to spend on players who are likewise willing to forgo a year of elite level action in exchange for a swollen bank balance. Probably sooner rather than later, United will be back competing, even if they are having to rebuild in circumstances similar to those under which City had to construct, with a weaker playing base than Chelsea had when Roman Abramovich bought Ken Bates's debt-laden club (but who had scraped into the Champions League qualifiers) in 2003.
Maybe as soon as next season United will be back challenging, but the incoming manager should not underestimate the battle they will face, then and for the foreseeable future.
Moyes's failures against the major clubs - winning just once and drawing three times in 12 attempts against the six teams ahead of Manchester United in the table - were of course a significant contributory factor to his failure. However, we should remember that the predictions that he was arriving at Old Trafford at a time of increasingly strong and widespread challenges to United have proved accurate.
Comparing this season to last, Liverpool have six more points than they achieved against Ferguson's team in their two matches, Chelsea have five more, Manchester City three more, Arsenal as many, Everton three more, Tottenham just as many. That accounts for 17 of the 27 points fewer that United have after 34 matches this season, but not all of the increases achieved by their rivals.
Discounting the additional points picked up against United, Liverpool have found a further 20 points over their total from the same number of games last season and Everton seven, Arsenal six and Chelsea a couple, while Manchester City are level pegging and even Tottenham are down only a couple. The figures are a touch misleading before we have a full season because the clubs had remaining matches of varying quality to play a year ago, but the point is clear enough: Moyes's United were up against improved and improving opposition in the top echelon, or at least better able to punish a weakened bottom 13.
Some of this was unpredictable - Brendan Rodgers' Liverpool were a work in very little apparent progress last summer, missing out on transfer targets, and Roberto Martinez was still at a Wigan side heading for relegation when Ferguson quit - but the consensus was that Roberto Mancini had made a mess of Manchester City's title defence and that Chelsea were likely to offer a renewed challenge, while Arsenal were not going to vanish. Moyes performed poorly but he was dropped into a more hostile environment than Ferguson faced most years. That is not going to change for the next manager.
Indeed while United will strengthen, so will most of the teams ahead of them at present. Everton are the ones who face the greatest struggle to do so; Martinez's use of loans is to be praised not derided but he will know that it is a trick he may have to repeat each summer, unless he can get his team into the Champions League. But the rest will all spend and Tottenham, who splashed out so much for so little as Gareth Bale left, may also find that some of last summer's signings improve significantly after a year in England, if given a chance.
United have dominated for more than two decades, and rarely had to battle more than one serious rival at a time. Those days are not coming back in a hurry and any United fans expecting a big-name manager to bring them back is likely to be in for disappointment.
Articles like this are of course nothing more than simple discussion points for people to air their opinions around..... Its nothing more than that... The only talking that counts is what takes place on the pitch! There is no such thing as a magic bullet in football.... Manchester United need: (1) A Good/Great experienced manager, that know how to handle a big club & big players, (2) Has a clear & positive attacking football philosophy, and is able to communicate effectively to the players, (3) A manager who has excellent tactical nous & motivational qualities, (4) Be a manager who players want to play for, and who can be a positive attraction for players to come to United, (5) Proven record as a winning manager over the years. Even with all these qualities, there are no guarantees of success, but it would increase the likelihood of success. Any new manager is a risk & offers no guarantees. Ryan Giggs does not currently fit the current requirements for Manchester United in my opinion. As regards other clubs, there is also no guarantees that any of Man City, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Everton, Spurs etc will be better next season. In my opinion the requirements at all these clubs will see declines at most of them, as they all require more than just tweaks to improve, and bring in new players & letting others leave is always risky, offering no guarantees. My own personal predictions for next season are United will be challenging for the title and Liverpool will finish outside the top 4! N.B. I am not just saying this because I am a United fan. But as I said earlier, the only talking that counts is that that takes place on the pitch! So time will tell!- thetruthwillout