One-man teams?

Daniel Storey makes the case for the defence amid accusations Liverpool and Spurs are one-man teams.

Last Updated: 08/03/13 at 13:24

Is there more to Liverpool and Tottenham than meets the eye?

Is there more to Liverpool and Tottenham than meets the eye?

On Sunday Spurs travel to Anfield in a game that pitches together the two form players of the Premier League. With Robin Van Persie's impressive scoring run for Manchester United drying up slightly of late (one goal in his last eight matches), Luis Suarez and Gareth Bale have been left as the brightest lights that the Premier League currently offers.

Suarez has six goals in his last three matches, and 14 in 13 games in a run stretching back to the end of December, and yet he is not even the man of the moment. Bale, allowed to operate in a more advanced role by Andre Villas-Boas, has been unstoppable of late. He has 11 goals in nine games for club and country, and whilst comparisons with the world's greatest players are still somewhat pre-emptive, the Welshman is certainly being discussed in the most glowing of terms. He is the overwhelming favourite to be crowned as Player of the Year.

Luis Suarez: Heads the goalscoring charts

Unfortunately, rather than simply be appreciated for their talents or respected for their contributions, the form of Bale and Suarez has attracted negativity towards their clubs. Both Spurs and Liverpool, it has been claimed, are one-man teams.

The accusation was labelled at Suarez by the Daily Express last November: "Liverpool 3 - Wigan 0: Luis Suarez proves Liverpool ARE a one-man team," the headline read, casually ignoring that full back Jose Enrique was actually chosen as Man of the Match after a goal and assist.

For Bale, it started with Sam Allardyce after his West Ham side's defeat to Spurs: "We've one man to thank for tonight's result and that's Gareth Bale, We have been beaten by Gareth Bale really," said Allardyce, after a match in which Gylfi Sigurdsson also scored an equaliser and Jussi Jaaskelainen was forced into making 13 saves.

The intent of such an insult is clear. Without these two players the clubs would be nothing, hinting at undeserved fortune, and they are in a falsely-inflated positions through the over-performance of one individual, far above the mean of the team as a whole. The term is typically labelled by (possibly envious) fans or rival clubs. More importantly, it is both foolish and illogical.

Initially, even examining the statement on its merit falls down. If Gareth Bale's Premier League goals had not been scored, Spurs would have seventeen less points, and would therefore sit ninth in the Premier League table. Luis Suarez's effect is even lower. Despite scoring 21 league goals this season, these have actually only gained Liverpool eight points, without which they would also sit in ninth, only two places lower than the position they currently occupy. Twelve of the Uruguayan's league goals came in matches that they would have won without his goalscoring contribution.

Even if the two players had not been available, both sides would have been presumably able to play a replacement? But, more pertinently, they were playing. Both Liverpool and Spurs paid transfer fees to have these players at their disposal. If they are performing to their full potential, surely that is the fault of other teams for their lack of purchase? The whole argument is based on a premise that is grounded in falsehood.

More importantly, such an insinuation highlights our fascination of the goal as football's only currency. Viewing the scoring of a goal as all-encompassing is nothing new in our game, but is intensely disrespectful to other players on the field. The last defender to win the Player of the Year award (voted by the players) was Paul McGrath in 1993, and the last to win the Football Writers' award was Liverpool's Steve Nicol in 1989, and even he roamed into midfield. That's 20 years without recognition. The last defender to win the Golden Ball at the World Cup? Uruguay's Jose Nasazzi in 1930.

This is a hugely simplistic view of a complex game. If we consider goals to be the sole currency of football, then surely goalkeepers and defenders that stop goals should be applauded even higher than strikers that often take two or three chances to score?

Crucially within this argument, such a mindset woefully ignores the impressive performances of less-heralded individuals. It ignores Steven Gerrard, with more assists than any other Premier League player this season and so often a provider for Suarez. It ignores Glen Johnson, with five assists from right-back and currently performing as well as he ever has. It ignores Jan Vertonghen, establishing himself as both versatile and reliable across the defence and in midfield during his first season in England. And it ignores Moussa Dembele, whose intricate passing and impressive stamina have enabled Bale to operate in a freer role, confident that his team mate will cover adequately. Finally, it ignores the managers, who have altered formations and styles to draw the best form from the two stars.

Gareth Bale has hogged the limelight this season but concedes it's his team-mates that allow him to play

On Sunday, there will be no doubting the importance of both Suarez and Bale, and it would be reasonable to suggest that they are the principal weapon possessed by their respective teams. However, to state that they are the sole reason for a team's positive results shows a great deal of footballing ignorance, over-simplifying simply for effect.

As former NBA star Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is quoted as saying: One man can be a crucial ingredient on a team, but no man can make a team.

You can only watch the best Barclays Premier League coverage here on Sky Sports. Watch Liverpool v Spurs exclusively live on Sky Sports 1HD, 3D and Sky Go from 3.00pm on Sunday 10th March. Click here for more details

Related News

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

I

worry about these types of conclusions on a teams brilliance when it was very clear that Argentina had 4 chances where they really should have scored and on chances alone then it would have been the more pragmatic Argentinians who would be the best in the world. I like the Germany team but this just shows that even with planning it relies on a great deal of luck and finding your opponents at just the right time.

dryice
Reward At Last For Years Of Careful Planning

W

e all know the British public don't have the patience to plan for 14 years. No chance. As soon as our young players don't win the world cup they get harrassed and abused to the point of mental breakdown. No, England likes to react to failure by sacking the manager and tearing up their best laid plans in favour of something shiny and new to keep the knee jerkers happy.

HarryBoulton
Reward At Last For Years Of Careful Planning

G

lad Messi was player of the tournament, there was no-one more deserving. Except Robben. And James Rodriguez. Or Muller and half the Germany team etc etc

sailingmagpie
Golden Ball award for Messi

Footer 365

World Cup: Luiz Felipe Scolari dismissed as Brazil coach according to local media

The CBF has decided not to renew the contract of national coach Luiz Felipe Scolari, according to media reports.

World Cup: Joachim Loew believes Germany can build a footballing dynasty after win in Brazil

Joachim Loew believes Germany's World Cup final victory is a tribute to the way their domestic game is run.

World Cup final: Mario Gotze scores in extra-time as Germany beat Argentina 1-0

Germany won the World Cup final for a fourth time after Mario Gotze's extra-time volley sealed a 1-0 win over Argentina.

Mail Box

Are Germany Now Going To Dominate?

We have your World Cup final reactions - some were wowed and others think it was all an anti-climax. We have lots of thoughts on Lionel Messi too. Has he flopped?

Alexis Sanchez: Really Not THAT Good

The backlash has begun: Why are Barca letting him go if he's any good? We have mails on Alexis Sanchez, Luis Suarez, the World Cup and the wonder of F365...

© 2014 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved A Sky Sports Digital Media property