Mercedes make their defence

Mercedes have insisted that Pirelli were solely responsible for the so-called 'secret test' after being accused by the FIA of flouting F1's Sporting Regulations by running their 2013 car without the permission of the governing body.

Last Updated: 21/06/13 at 11:53 Post Comment

On a day of high drama at a specially-convened meeting of the International Tribunal in Paris investigating the three-day test held at Barcelona's Circuit de Catalunya after the Spanish GP, the FIA accused Mercedes of contravening Article 151c of the governing body's International Sporting Code.

The clause prohibits "any fraudulent conduct or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition or to the interests of motorsport generally".

According to Mark Howard QC, representing the FIA, "undoubtedly Mercedes obtained information during this test and it is self-evidently prejudicial to the sporting competition".

At the heart of the team's defence is their longstanding argument that the test was hosted by Pirelli and, as such, they could not be held responsible for its staging or any alleged wrongdoing.

The team also seized upon the exact wording of Article 22.1, which both Mercedes and Pirelli were accused of breaking in their summons to attend the hearing.

It states that 'Track testing shall be considered any track running time not part of an Event undertaken by a competitor entered in the Championship, using cars which conform substantially with the current Formula One Technical Regulations in addition to those from the previous or subsequent year.'

"This was not a test undertaken by Mercedes. They are critical words in text of Article 22 - 'undertaken by'," argued Paul Harris QC, representing the Brackley-based outfit.

In a potentially-critical exchange that could be seen to provide Mercedes with an invaluable escape clause, it was also revealed that when Sebastian Barnard, the FIA's legal advisor, was asked by race director Charlie Whiting whether participation in the test could be considered to have been undertaken by Pirelli rather than a 'competitor', he replied: 'Yes, we could take this position, it is not an undertaking from the competitor'.

For their part, Pirelli begin their defence in the bluntest terms by stating that "we do not come under the jurisdiction or authority of the FIA". That announcement sparked a series of spikey exchanges as Howard dismissed Pirelli's testimony as "confused and missing the point", before thanking Ross Brawn for "giving the game away" with his admission that Mercedes would have gained "knowledge" through their participation.

In an unexpected twist, Mercedes also strived to turn the tables on Ferrari by accusing the Scuderia of breaching the rules surrounding in-season testing when they ran their 2011 car following the Bahrian GP.

The team did, however, offer an apology for instructing their two race drivers, Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg, to wear unmarked helmets during the three-day event in order to ward off attention from any prying eyes.

Earlier, as the case for the prosecution was set out, it was announced:

- Although 'informal communications' took place between the FIA and Mercedes, the governing body did not receive an 'outlining' of when the test would happen or under what terms.

- Mercedes requested permission to stage the test in a telephone call with Charlie Whiting, the FIA race director.

- Upon receiving the request, Whiting took advice from the FIA's legal department who informed him the test would only be permissible if all the other teams were copied into the request and were provided with an equal opportunity to take part.

- The FIA have also maintained that although Pirelli's commercial agreement with the governing body permits up to 1000km of testing with any of the teams, their contract also stipulates they are bound to the FIA's own Sporting Regulations as well.

With Pirelli's testimony already delayed until the afternoon, a ruling on the saga is only expected to be published on Friday.

A guilty verdict against either party could have massive and far-reaching repercussions for the sport.

Pirelli remain F1's sole tyre supplier but are yet to sign a contract extension beyond his season while Mercedes' own future in the sport may be plunged into doubt if any punishment was considered too severe.

Follow the latest twitter updates from Paris as the Tribunal begins

TEAMtalk Facebook Fan Page

The TEAMtalk fan page is a great place to meet like minded people, have football related discussions and make new friends.

Related News

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

E

ven if United were to sign CR7 & Messi to play upfront, the fact remains Fletcher and Cleverly are playing in midfield. That's where the problem is. Fletcher is too slow with an awful pass, while Cleverly is simply rubbish

mrunited4life
Di Maria - A Signing of Necessity, or Opportunity?

T

hese days, these days, you can't say something racist without somebody saying that you're a racist.

tk421
'Wrong' Views Not Silenced By Shouting...

D

rop Rooney (he's so disappointing, overrated and overpaid), and play Di Maria and RVP upfront, much like the set up at the Netherlands team with Roben and RVP...

eric bush3
Di Maria - A Signing of Necessity, or Opportunity?

Footer 365

Champions League: Emergency keeper sends Ludogorets through to group stage

Emergency keeper Cosmin Moti saved two penalties as Bulgarians Ludogorets Razgrad made the Champions League group stage.

Arsene Wenger confirms injured Arsenal striker Olivier Giroud will be out until New Year

Arsenal striker Olivier Giroud is unlikely to play again this year after having surgery on his injured ankle.

Villa and QPR shocked, Leeds lose

Aston Villa were shocked 1-0 at home by Leyton Orient in the Capital One Cup second round, while QPR lost at Burton and Bradford beat Leeds.

Mail Box

Should Kagawa Play Ahead Of Mata?

That's one question posed in the afternoon mailbox, although it looks like the Japanese playmaker could soon be on his way. Plus, tipping Palace to go down under Warnock...

Well, This Isn't Going That Well Is It?

Plenty of fall out from Manchester United's shambolic 4-0 League Cup defeat, plus thoughts on Van Persie, Arsenal strikers, Benik Afobe, Celtic and Astroturf...

© 2014 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved A Sky Sports Digital Media property