FA in 'horror tackle' change

The FA has changed its regulations on retrospective action to banish horror tackles that go unpunished.

Last Updated: 12/07/13 at 16:44 Post Comment

Callum McManaman: Referee Mark Halsey said he would have sent off the Wigan midf

Callum McManaman: Referee Mark Halsey said he would have sent off the Wigan midf

The Football Association has broadened its scope to retrospectively punish foul play.

Under an amendment to the current policy the FA will, from the start of the new season, be able to act on incidents that the match officials were not in a position to "fully assess".

Before today's change, which was ratified by the FA's Regulatory Authority, retrospective action could only be taken if none of the match officials saw a "coming together" or an incident was deemed "truly exceptional".

The move is aimed to allow steps to punish clashes such as Wigan forward Callum McManaman's tackle on Newcastle's Massadio Haidara last season, which went unpunished after referee Mark Halsey did not have a view of the incident.

With Halsey's assistants and the fourth official also not in a place to see the challenge in its entirety, McManaman escaped despite the serious threat of injury to Haidara.

In a statement issued on the FA website, the governing body outlined the changes but insisted they would be used sparingly and would not take any power away from the match officials.

"From the start of the new season, The FA will reserve the right to take retrospective action when match officials are not in a position to fully assess a 'coming together' of players," the statement read.

"Prior to this change, which was ratified by The Football Regulatory Authority, The FA was only able to take retrospective action when none of the match officials had seen the 'coming together' or when the incident was truly exceptional, for example, in the case of Ben Thatcher's challenge on Pedro Mendes (in 2006).

"This change is not intended to usurp the authority of the match officials who are, in the vast majority of cases, best-placed to deal with incidents at the time they occur.

"It will only be utilised in the rare circumstances outlined above."


Click here for completely free £10 bet with Sky Bet


Related News

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

I

put Ince in my fantasy football team, so it's no surprise at all really. I do that to players. Also responsible for De Jong and Upson being injured. Think I'll transfer in Di Maria just to ruin United....

megabrow (cufc)
F365's Top Ten Surprise Strugglers

L

ovren? £20m always seemed a touch on the expensive side, but I wasn't expecting him to be quite such a waste of money

stevenjameshyde
F365's Top Ten Surprise Strugglers

H

alf of our players have the physical presence of a 14 year old girl. I don't know why people are always shocked that they're injured.

TheWhiz
Wenger baffled by injuries

Footer 365

England: Arsene Wenger believes Arsenal's Kieran Gibbs can become next Ashley Cole

Arsene Wenger believes Kieran Gibbs can follow Ashley Cole's example and become England's first choice left-back.

Gerry Francis believes Roy Hodgson should now look to his younger players

Gerry Francis believes the forthcoming international fixtures are the perfect time for Roy Hodgson to field new talent.

Scholes blasts City 'atmosphere'

Former Manchester United midfielder Paul Scholes has strongly criticised the atmosphere at Manchester City's Champions League tie against Roma.

Mail Box

Do City Really Need To Expand Their Stadium?

That's the question posed by one Man United fan in the mailbox after seeing the empty seats at the Etihad last night. Sadly, there isn't a single mail from a City supporter...

#Usingfootballersnamesineverydaylife

We have the last of these as well as mails on Liverpool, Wayne Rooney, QPR, Arsenal's injuries and more. It's a mailbox that's Alonso rather than Rafael, if you will...

© 2014 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved A Sky Sports Digital Media property