Search

FA Protecting Referees? Nonsense

The FA will not re-referee matches in an attempt to protect referees and yet their decisions undermine their officials and draw attention to bad decisions. It makes no sense.

Post a Comment:

Comments 1 - 7 of (7)

Synergy says...

When I first saw it in real time, I thought the player who dived in before the ball struck Fellaini hand balled it as he had his hands raised when he dived in. Also the position of the free kick was at or about where he was.

Off course the replays an slow motion replays show that his hands didn't make contact with it and it was a clear handball by Fellaini and hence a penalty.

In a way it was the balancing decision for the wrongly disallowed everton goal so in this game it all balanced out in the end.

Posted 11:44am 21st March 2013

s.griffin says...

The FA do not want to undermine the referees by re-refereeing their decisions, which is fair in my opinion. But what message do the FA think they are sending out when they tell us that the assistant referee saw that tackle and deemed it not necessary to bring it to the referee's attention? What does that tell us about the assistant referee's competence? Forget us, the fans, what does that tell the players regarding that referee's competence? Will the players respect that referee again? Also, what actions have been taken against that assistant referee, as a punishment for his ridiculous amount of incompetence? Are we going to see him running on the touchline with that flag in his hand during the next gameweek? High time the referees take responsibility for their actions.

Posted 5:58am 21st March 2013

nathaus (Fulham) says...

If nothing more, then perhaps this whole furore will encourage the FA to look at this process for next season. I understand why they think they shouldn't change procedure half way through the season (more than halfway actually), as there were probably similar incidents earlier in the season and I've always thought it's better to be consistently wrong rather than just inconsistent. At least everyone knows the 'rules' and the implementation in this case. Still, how they came up with this procedure in the first place is beyond me.

Posted 4:51am 21st March 2013

colinhunt says...

i think for the reasons you stated Mark Bunn was harshly sent off, on the replay it seems his hands are not away from his body but in fact tucked onto his chest,the ball hits his elbow, it's not deliberate and it was from a very close distance.

Posted 1:57am 21st March 2013

bernsteinforpm (Manchester City) says...

Rob I hope you don't mind me linking a couple of your sentences, but a few people have said that the Fellani handball was given as a freekick to avoid having to also give Fellani a second yellow card. To me this is nonsensical as I don't see why it would have been a bookable offence inside or outside the box and I assume, from this article, you'd agree. Anyway, as you say other breaks went our way in the same game so we can't really complain about being outplayed at Goodison again.

Posted 10:24pm 20th March 2013

nidge (Manchester United) says...

So does over-turning red cards upon appeal from the club not count as re-refereeing? (Is that a word??) It's no different! I think most people accept that referees are not perfect and that decisions made in real time might not be accurate. Even if the referee felt undermined, so what- that is surely the lesser of two evils; the other being not punishing "tackles" that could end someone's career. The FA need to sort their priorities out.

Posted 6:17pm 20th March 2013

shagwa (Chelsea) says...

How much of the incident does the assistant have to see for it to be unreviewable? If he sees McManaman go sliding in and get the ball and doesn't see the studs to the knee that follow, is that considered to be the officials "seeing the incident"? Had never before thought of the incongruity between overturning incorrect suspensions and not suspending players deserving of one.

Posted 4:02pm 20th March 2013

  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1

Sky Bet

    • Retrieving latest Sky Bet odds

Most Commented

Readers' Comments

I

m curious as to what image Real Madrid are trying to re-establish as I always thought their pre-Jose image was one of a bunch of a classless bullies tapping up whoever they wanted while living it large on borrowed money they're never going to pay back.

john matrix
Perez Will Spend Big To Forget Jose...

A

t the start of the season, after the RVP transfer, I confidently claimed that Arsenal would finish above United. I now regret it immensely.

Fuzzy_Dunlop
Reflecting On The F365 Pre-Season Predictions

D

aniel Storey generally did very well, going against the City won it last year so they're bound to win it this time grain. As for John Nicholson, I wouldn't trust him to predict correctly what day of the week it will be tomorrow.

Griff
Reflecting On The F365 Pre-Season Predictions

Latest Photos

Footer 365

Whelan hopeful over Monday meet

Wigan chairman Dave Whelan is increasingly confident Roberto Martinez will stick with them to lead their bid to return to the Premier League.

Diego Maradona would relish a role at Napoli, claims Argentine legend's lawyer

Diego Maradona's lawyer says his client would like to be involved with Napoli, who are currently without a manager.

Europa winners to land CL spot

UEFA sources have confirmed that from 2015 the winners of the Europa League will qualify for the following season's Champions League.

Mail Box

More Scared Of Losing AVB Than Bale...

We thought we would have to resort to another mailbox about maths but we've had some grand opinions about Man United, Newcastle, Tottenham and more. Oh and maths...

An Ode To Rafa And Loads More Mails...

We have one Chelsea fan who recognises the job done by Rafa Benitez while there's maths from Liverpool, Newcastle and Manchester. And Shawcross to Arsenal? Nah...

Site Map

Our Network

Websites

Partners

Betting & Gaming

Mobile, Fun & Games

© 2013 British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. All Rights Reserved