If Russian linesman Gennady Krasyuk could see properly, Chelsea would no longer exist. You think we're on the baccy they call whacky, don't you?
It's simple, really. Allow us to explain.
Manchester United versus Porto, second leg in the last 16 of the 2004 Champions League. United trail 2-1 from the first leg but are 1-0 up on the night thanks to a crisp Paul Scholes header from John O'Shea's fine left-wing cross.
Just before half-time, O'Shea drives the ball into a crowded Porto penalty area and Scholes pounces, one touch, control, second touch, goal and wheels away in... despair. Linesman Krasyuk has ruled the little ginger assassin offside. He is on, by at least a yard. Had Krasyuk not read the rules before the game? The rules that state: disallowing a United goal at home is an act punishable by a severe Scottish shouting to the face. What was he thinking?
If that goal had been allowed, United would have been 2-0 up, Tim Howard wouldn't have panicked in the last minute and gifted a tap-in to Costinha. Jose Mourinho wouldn't have sprinted like a well-dressed, moody-looking gazelle along the touchline to incite the crowd, Porto wouldn't have gone through and, quite clearly, wouldn't have been European Champions.
The once and future king, José, would have been just another manager who came and saw and lost at Old Trafford. There'd have been no throwing of medals into the crowd, no looking sexy and gorgeous in victory. No being thought of as God's gift to football, women and well-tailored clothing. No lovely coats. Nothing. José Who?
Roman Abramovich, a man whose football wish list is seemingly decided by whatever Russian and other Eastern European players he thinks are cool, or whoever else happens to be the flavour of the month, does not hire Mourinho as Chelsea manager when he tires of Claudio Ranieri in the summer of 2004. Why would he?
Instead, he hires the coach of the summer's Champions' League winner: Didier Deschamps of AS Monaco. The former Chelsea player is given plenty of money to spend, and he spends it badly, because Didier is a ropey old manager and hasn't a clue how to win the Premier League with a team of over paid prima donnas. As Avram Grant and not-so-big-now Phil have found out, it's actually quite hard, and you have to be a bit brilliant to do it.
Didier turns to the old boys network and Roman is delighted to see genuine legends of the game, like Zinedine Zidane, and long-time Chelsea targets like David Trezeguet and Alessandro Del Piero come to the club. Unfortunately, Deschamps can't motivate them and the only thing that seems to get his massive earners out of bed in the morning is infighting as to who has the most enormous contract. The club's wage bill is spiralling out of control, but success is not forthcoming because, as Manchester City have shown us, you can spend as much money as you want but it doesn't mean instant success.
So not for Chelsea the back-to-back titles and the incredible unbeaten run. There's no ads for American Express for Didier. No swooning middle-England housewives, no enigmatic press conferences, no worrying about bird flu. No looking like a movie star while prowling on the touchline. It all goes horribly wrong.
The Sun mocks up an image of him as one of Ken Dodd's diddy men. Because Didier sounds a bit like diddy. See?
Turns out that Chelsea had peaked under the poetic insanity of Ranieri. They slip down the league.
When they finish the 2005-2006 season in fourth place, Abramovich has seen enough. He fires Deschamps and, in a widely derided move, installs Andriy Shevchenko as player coach with Sergei Baltacha in a supervisory, Director of Football role. The players revolt. When a delegation lead by Frank Lampard protest, Roman tears up Lampard's contract and throws it in the bin. It would have missed but deflects in off a chair-leg. But worse is to come.
With the team labouring in mid-table and Abramovich facing financial and legal difficulties over some of his business interests, he decides to go underground. The ever-silent owner now disappears entirely from public view and is never seen again. Sick of football and now obsessed with post-impressionist art and beautiful women, he plots his exit from the game he has come to hate for not delivering him glory and public acceptance.
From a secret underground lair in the Ukraine, he puts the club on the market. There are few takers. £600 million in the hole, Roman decides to bail out at any price and when John Terry urinates in a vodka bar on a night out, Roman's had enough. Like a spurned lover, Roman sells the club, out of spite, to Ken Bates. For a pound.
Bates realises that he has a job on his hands attempting to service the club's debts, which run into the hundreds of million. He brings in "a safe pair of hands" as a partner as they try to turn Chelsea around. Peter Ridsdale.
Chastened by his experience at Leeds, Ridsdale conducts a slash and burn policy to try and save the club, Terry and Lampard are sold to Fulham, but he can't raise enough money to cover the club's debts. The administrators are called in.
On 23 December 2007, Peter Ridsdale reluctantly admits that the gates to Stamford Bridge will not open again. They have been sold for scrap. Chelsea FC is defunct.
So you see, if that Scholes goal had been correctly allowed, Chelsea would no longer exist. That Russian linesman has a lot to answer for.
Alan Tyers and John Nicholson
Your Comments
severed
"It both pains and amuses me to see how many people are taking this article seriously. Good one, by the way."
shamsulbar
"Yeah right! What if Dalglish didnt leave Liverpool? Ferguson would have been sacked. Shearer would have been a Liverpool player. Liverpool would continue dominating English football. Arsene Wenger would still be in Japan Brune Rioch would be their long-term Manager. Mourinho would still be managing Porto because Liverpool would be dominating Europe and Porto wouldnt stand a chance..."
Geoff_the_Red
"Well it made for a pleasant change for United's opponents to be the beneficiaries of some dodgy decisions for once."
dreamlander
"I stopped after "Deschamps is a ropey old manager!" Under what evidence? Getting to a Champions League final with Monaco and helping retain Juventus' stars after relegation to Serie B following Caliopoli? Sounds like the kind of thing any old two bob spoofer could havwe done alright! "
chrisspeet
"I've waited for this article to be written for so so long. Thank you."
vitreous
"Chelsea exists or not...we all know, come on guys, spit it, UNITED's THE BEST!!!!"
forever_united
"i completely hav to agree with the article...an even if monaco wud hav lost to man utd roman wud hav chosan deschamps,if not deschamps den smone else but surely not mourinho who den wud jus be a uefa cup winner.An yes things cud be different cz even though im a united fan but i think jose is 'the special one'(bt abv nt as special as our gaffer) and he knws how to handle football millionares.An roman abramovich with his impatience an apparent lack of footballing sense wud hav made stupid decisions an chelsea wud hav ended up like man city are going to in a few years.Dat offside!!!!!"
chelseablue
"The writers of this piece think they are clever, the fact that Roman bought Chelsea BEFORE that game doesn't change a thing about the fact that he owns Chelsea. All that would be different was that maybe Jose would not have been manager, then again he may well still have been manager as if was obvious that he was an up and coming manager. Just maybe Ranieri would have been given another season. But the facts remain, Ranieri spent the first £150 mil, Jose the next £150-200 mil or whoever would have been his replacement. It doesn't mean that Chelsea would not have won those back to back titles, it also doesn't say that IF Jose had not been manager whoever was in his place wouldn't have won 4 titles on the trot and a couple of Champions Leagues thrown in. It's all a case of IFs and BUTs. BUT then I guess you have to justify your exsistance as Journos."
Syd_Barrett
"Ok dude I know what you mean but isn't it nice when good humour starts from some kind of real basis? I don't think people want to read this the same way they would a Reid-Allardyce Thailand adventure (really miss them btw). I also instinctly thought "ah c'mon monaco would never have won the CL..."
And Zidane being a bad professional?? That's blasphemy!
"
vaxi
"Like the corrupt ref who admitted that he been paid off in the UEFA Cup Final (v Nott Forest i think) a few years back; I think Krasyuk needs to make a public confession soon.
I remember being at that match, every time Utd attacked in the firsty half, he would happily signal for a foul or offside.
It got so bad, once Utd took an attacking throw-in and the same linesman signalled offside. The crowd very rightly started shouted at him; and the ref had to go over and tell the linesman that you cant be offside from a throw-in.
Later on, watching a repeat of the match, Big Ron blamed it nerves. $$$$ more like it.
Either that, or he was S**t"
All comments on this story