Europe’s biggest net spends since 2015: Liverpool 29th

Date published: Thursday 23rd January 2020 8:38

Raheem Sterling Manchester City Liverpool

This is a top 12 so there is no sign of Chelsea (26th), Liverpool (29th) or Tottenham (32nd), which makes the success of the Reds even more ridiculous.

All the numbers are from transfermarkt, so there may be discrepancies in currency conversion but this list provides a picture.


12) Real Madrid. Net spend: £217.5m
Real Madrid have actually spent less than Chelsea over the last five years but their net spend dwarves the west Londoners’ because they invested rather a lot of money to appease Zinedine Zidane last summer, but only shed a couple of first-teamers. That has left Real with a whole raft of players who could be sold to raise funds and lower the wage bill. A cull really should be incoming with Gareth Bale, James Rodriguez, Marcelo and Isco among those with single-figure La Liga starts this season.


11) Wolves. Net spend: £225.2m
Wolves have spent the lion’s share of £190m since promotion – with Patrick Cutrone counting as the one expensive mistake – but their only £10m-plus sales over the last five years have been Benik Afobe and Benik Afobe. That’s not really a long-term plan.


10) Brighton. Net spend: £229.54m
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why Brighton dispensed with Chris Hughton despite his efforts in leading the Seagulls to promotion and then survival; Brighton want some bang for their buck. But they really might need to sell some players at some juncture to be a viable business as they have not sold a single player for more than £3.5m over the last five years. The test will come if/when somebody offers £50m for Lewis Dunk.


9) Everton. Net spend: £250.5m
The danger of lurching from manager to manager and philosophy to philosophy is laid bare by Everton actually spending more than Arsenal (and oodles more than Tottenham) over five years of under-achievement. Fourteen players have arrived for over £20m in five years; how many of them can we file under ‘success’? And how many have a high re-sale value? The good news is that Carlo Ancelotti does seem to have a plan.


8) Juventus. Net spend: £288.5m
Only Monaco have sold players for more money since 2015 than Juventus, with eight players leaving the club for at least £20m in a spell which has seen them dominate Italian football. Money has of course been spent – most notably on Cristiano Ronaldo but also on Paulo Dybala, Gonzalo Higuain and Matthijs de Ligt – but there are high volumes of players going in and out of the club. And it clearly works. Or works just shy of European glory anyway. Oh and they will never get that Ronaldo money back…


7) Arsenal. Net spend: £292.64m
They have sold players for around half Liverpool’s transfer income over the last five years. In this spell, they have lost Serge Gnabry, Jack Wilshere, Wojciech Szczesny and Aaron Ramsey for pennies at best, with brief moments of professionalism to get decent money for Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, Theo Walcott, Olivier Giroud and Alex Iwobi. Meanwhile, nine players have arrived for £20m or more and not a single one of those players is worth considerably more than Arsenal spent on them. When you’re not playing Champions League football, those figures are unsustainable in the long term.


6) Inter Milan. Net spend: £312.3m
No real sales last summer – and a £140m splurge on Romelu Lukaku et al. – has seen Inter fly up this table in pursuit of a first title in ten years under Antonio Conte. And if the Italian has his way, they will be splurging once again in January with Christian Eriksen likely to follow Ashley Young to Milan.


5) Barcelona. Net spend: £337.8m
Only six clubs across Europe have received more transfer income than selling club Barcelona over the last five years; that’s the Neymar effect. They have spent considerable amounts too – over £100m each on Philippe Coutinho, Ousmane Dembele and Antoine Griezmann – so there is an awful lot of money flowing through that club. And there needs to be more in January as the new manager eyes a striker to replace the crocked Luis Suarez.


4) AC Milan. Net spend: £409.94m
Even Arsenal are better at recouping money from sales than AC Milan, whose horrendous mismanagement means they have bought badly and sold worse. There has been a change of focus – £90m was spent purely on young players last summer – but there is still an awful lot of expensive deadwood in a squad that remains on the outside of the Champions League cash cow.


3) Paris Saint-Germain. Net spend: £444.6m
After spending all of the money on Neymar and Kylian Mbappe, there has been relative parsimony at PSG, who actually made a transfer profit this season by selling a whole raft of squad players and spending moderate amounts on Abdou Diallo and Idrissa Gueye. Their big-name signing – Mauro Icardi – actually arrived on loan, though he will cost £60m next summer if they choose to make the switch permanent.


2) Manchester United. Net spend: £483.8m
Wow. That is quite some era of underachievement. To only receive £20m or more for three players – Morgan Schneiderlin, Angel di Maria and Romelu Lukaku – in five years is almost miraculous. Meanwhile, they have taken big hits on Shinji Kagawa, Di Maria himself, Nani, Robin van Persie, Memphis Depay and Ander Herrera and bought a grand total of 12 players for £20m or more. They’re basically like Everton but with more money. Not a compliment.


1) Manchester City. Net spend: £668.6m
Now that is a lot of money. Despite only having a record transfer of £62m, City have outspent every other European club bar Juventus over the last five years because they have bought a massive 16 players for over £20m. The difference between them and United is that they are actually playing those expensive footballers. Nine of those 16 started against Sheffield United on Tuesday while another three were on the bench. Like United, they have struggled to sell for big money – only three players have gone for over £20m in five years – but they have won two Premier League titles.

Sarah Winterburn


More Related Articles